Archive for the ‘news’ Category

interrupting spells in 4e

Friday, January 14th, 2011

“He’s a dark elf wizard and he’s put some kind of hold on Derek!” Elistan cried. “Keep him from casting spells!”

-The Magic of Krynn (Dragonlance Tales, Volume 1)

Every D&D rule change comes with tradeoffs. In 4th edition, wizards were rebalanced. The advantage is that they are no longer overpowered compared to other classes. The disadvantage is that they are no longer overpowered compared to other classes.

I kind of miss the panic that set in when earlier-edition parties met a wizard, and all the maneuvering (by the party and the DM) to hit a wizard before he finishes his spell. However, honestly, 4th edition works perfectly well without it.

That’s not a reason to tinker with what ain’t broke, though. I’d like to try to return wizards to their place as fearsome super-artillery without overpowering them (much). Here’s my plan.

4e wizards may cast attack spells normally, or they may cast them as a “rite” (sort of halfway between an attack spell and a ritual, and analagous to 3rd edition spells with a full-round casting time). Casting a spell as a rite ends your turn and has no immediate effect.

On your next turn, you may finish the rite as a standard action. You cast the spell normally, except that any hit by the spell is a guaranteed critical hit.

During your casting of the spell, you are saying magic words, performing ritual gestures, and doing other wizardy things. If your concentration is broken, you lose the spell. Non-damaging forced movement, being knocked prone, being grabbed, etc. forces an Endurance check of 5 + 1/2 the attacker’s level to avoid breaking concentration. If damage is done to the wizard, the DC of the Endurance check is equal to the damage.

Is this option too underpowered (never used) or overpowered (always used)? It seems to me that it will be situational. Spending two turns to do slightly more than double damage starts out pretty balanced; if it’s successfully used with a daily power, it’s quite good indeed. However, if there is any chance of the rite being interrupted, it might be too risky to use it. Wizards might only use it when they’re in a position where they think they can avoid attack for a turn.

Rites might be used by the DM more often than they are used by PC wizards. A wizard who has begun a rite becomes a fearsome threat and may cause an abrupt change in the PCs’ tactics.

mazed in monsters

Monday, January 10th, 2011
This entry is part 19 of 34 in the series Mazes and Monsters

OK, we’ve got pretty much a complete game out of Mazes and Monsters. We’ve figured out combat, skills and spells: everything we need for a generic sword-and-sorcery game.

All that’s remaining are a few Mazes-and-Monsters-specific rules hints dropped by the characters. Frankly, a lot of them don’t receive a lot of rules support in the movie at all, and some almost seem like offhand fake-jargon that’s being made up on the spot. But we know that
THAT’S
NOT
TRUE.

There is Underlying Truth to be found here: we just have to dig it up.

Get your shovels!

Mazed

One of the focuses of Mazes and Monsters is the thin line between fantasy and reality.

Equally thin is the line between players and characters. Both players and characters can become confused about what’s real and what’s not.

We’ve determined that when a character is confused, they enter the “Mazed” condition. A Mazed character’s mini is placed in a special square on the Mazes and Monsters gameboard, which I will call the “Maze Prison”.

Mazes and Monsters boardWhen a character is Mazed, their perception of reality can be skewed by whoever is imposing the condition. Friends may appear enemies and vice versa; an open door may appear to be a solid wall; or the character may be totally immersed in a fantasy world that has no connection to reality (or, technically, a fantasy world that has no connection to the shared fantasy world of Mazes and Monsters: a higher level of fantasy, if you will.) All details of the fantasy are determined by the creature or effect that imposes it.

The power of a Maze is measured by the RONA check to escape it. Like other RONAs, it ranges from 3 (Easy) to 9 (Hard).

When an effect Mazes you, you may make an immediate RONA check to shake off the illusion. If you succeed, it exerts no more power over you. If you fail, you are locked into the illusion until some outside force challenges your delusion. Such an event is called a Maze Disruption, and it allows you to make a new RONA check, against the same difficulty, to break free of the illusion. If this new check fails, you incorporate the disruption within the Maze delusion, and that same effect will no longer provide you with a chance to break free.

Example Maze Disruptions:
-If you’ve been Mazed to believe an open door is a solid wall, you may make a new RONA check if someone passes through the door.
-If you’ve been Mazed to think that your friend is a fierce Gorville, you may make a new RONA check if your friend talks to you and reminds you of your shared friendship.

Caution: According to Mazes and Monsters, these are rules for real life as well!

Next week: We’ll cover more movie jargon, “fantasies and scenarios”! Will this be the sexiest Mazes and Monsters article yet??

African Civilizations: best sourcebook ever

Friday, January 7th, 2011

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

Wow, I got more than a dozen blog posts about game ideas out of this book. This book gave me more D&D inspiration than most WOTC sourcebooks I can remember. Not surprising: books of archaeology and history are likely to spur a lot of campaign settings ideas.

A book about Africa is uniquely suited to D&D idea mining. For one thing, it’s unfamiliar. Your D&D group may have some medieval history buffs in it. Fewer groups have any Africa experts. I never learned about pre-colonial African history in school. (In fact, a lot of its history was entirely unknown until archaeological work in the last few decades.) As far as my familiarity with the subject matter went, the history in this book might as well have been the history of an alternate Earth. Which is basically what a D&D campaign world is: that plus magic.

After my reading, I didn’t end up with an Africa-themed campaign: I still have a typically Western European fantasy world. However, the interaction of these two milieus provided some interesting and peculiar details. The Plateau of Spirits and the Raid Year, the sacrifice of the Stag King, the roadside altars, the Wind of No Return, the Elves of the Ruins, and the dwarven soul discs give specificity to my campaign world.

blog of holding’s first year

Thursday, December 30th, 2010

We’ve been blogging since mid-February 2010, and in that time we’ve written almost 250 posts. At first, we were posting once or twice a week. There have been occasional hyper moments: sometimes when we went to Gencon or liveblogged Essentials we posted up to 8 posts a day. In recent months, though, we’ve been posting pretty steadily about 4 or 5 posts a week.

Along the way, we’ve done a couple things I’m proud of: put the Monster Manual 3 on a business card, gotten a favorable review from Mike Mearls, re-invented a seminal RPG, and fixed 4e.

All of this supports my theory that Blog of Holding is a bunch of badasses. You can bounce a nickel of the rock hard abs of our RPG musings. And the nickel will come back a dime.

Next year, the goals are: 1) hit 500 posts, and 2) be mentioned favorably in a press conference by the President of the United States.

Also, tour the world with our rock band, “Blog of Holding Dot Com”.

the elves of the ruins

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

The Zimbabwe plateau is filled with monumental stone structures, built during the European medieval and renaissance period. Archaeologists don’t really know what people built them. In the 19th century, archaeologists found that the people currently living in the ruins didn’t know who had built them either, or what they were for. They had just moved into some empty ruins.

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

OK, so it would be cool to have a people living in and among the ruins of an unidentified higher civilization. Who should the current inhabitants be?

Old-school elves are surprisingly good candidates.
(more…)

the magic king

Friday, December 17th, 2010

I’ve mentioned before that in a D&D world, where magic works, we should trust ceremony. One ceremony I haven’t discussed yet is the anointing of a king. In Africa this was apparently very important: African Civilizations mentions that all the African civilizations studied in the book appear to use religious ideology to support the power of its ruling class. In some places in central Africa, kings were worshiped as recently as the 20th century.

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

D&D, and fantasy in general, tends to be deeply conservative, in that its heroes tend to be the type who support the status quo, or want to return a recent status quo. They oppose evil forces who want to change things for the worse. (Liberal fantasy would be, I guess, about educating the peasants or something: change would generally be regarded in a more positive light.)

Because fantasy is conservative, it idealizes the institution of kingship. The rules of monarchy have the power of natural law.

A king has a lot of political powers, but in a magical world, I think a king has some magical powers too.

a) A king’s blood is sacred. A subject who kills his rightful king will fall under a curse, probably for many generations.

b) A king has ritual powers. A king can perform “speech acts”: appointing people knights and nobles, and probably performing weddings and funerals, too, like the captain of a boat.

b) A king has healing powers. In medieval England, for instance, a king’s touch was supposed to cure tuberculosis. Between this and the ritual powers, a king basically has all the powers of a cleric. Makes sense, since if a king is not in the “leader” role, who is?

c) A king has powers related to national defense. Many kingdoms probably have some magic items or rituals usable only by the true king in defense of the kingdom. Excalibur comes to mind.

combat in Mazes and Monsters (including, of course, maiming and slaughter)

Monday, December 13th, 2010
This entry is part 18 of 34 in the series Mazes and Monsters

Last week we started work on the Mazes and Monsters combat system, figuring out HP and damage. That was the easy part: hit rolls are really the central feature of combat.

Let’s use RONA for this. As you may remember, using RONA, you roll a D12 and try to hit a target number. If you have an applicable trait, you roll 2d12 and take the highest number.

Wimpy monsters require an Easy Rona (a roll of 3 or more on an exploding d12); middle-range monsters Average (6) and tough or well-armored foes Hard (9).

Characters don’t necessarily get much better at hitting as they level. As soon as they get a trait that lets them roll 2d12 for their attack, they’re as good as they’ll ever be.

This is a departure from fantasy RPGs like D&D, which give the PCs (and monsters) steadily increasing hit chances as they level. Mazes and Monsters, on the other hand, provides steadily increasing damage; we don’t need to double-dip.

Armor

Armor in Mazes and Monsters is very limited! Iglacia the Fighter has listed among her possessions “armor”, “shield”, and “helmet”. No “leather”, “chain”, or “plate”; no armor+1. Just “Armor”.

Let’s say that hitting an unarmored character requires an Average success: in essence, you need to roll a 6 to hit them. We’ll give each of Armor, Helm, and Shield a +1 to that number, so a fully-armored character like Iglacia requires a 9 to hit: a Hard RONA.

Is there anything on Iglacia’s character sheet to bear out this theory?

Well, there is a stat right below H.P. I can’t make out the acronym: it’s two letters, and its value is 10. If I had to guess, I’d say that the letters were “P.T.” or “T.P.” or “B.R.” or something like that. Since I can’t figure out what it is, I’m going to declare that it’s “P.R.”, “Protection RONA”. It’s 10, instead of 9, which gives Iglacia a better defense than we theorized! Maybe Armor grants +2 P.R. while the helm and shield grant +1 each.

Weapons

Iglacia has a couple of weapons on her character sheet: mace, axe, and the Talking Sword of Loghri. She must have had some reason for keeping her mace even after she got her Talking Sword of Logrhi. How are we going to differentiate these weapons?

I’m tempted to adopt the D&D3 solution of giving monsters resistances and weaknesses to bashing, piercing, or slashing weapons. We can extend that to spells, too: maze mummies are weak to fire, for instance.

Actually, given that the only type of armor is “armor”, the list of weapons in Mazes and Monsters probably isn’t very long. No footman’s mace or Bohemian earspoon here. Instead of dividing weapons into categories, we can just give monsters resistances to specific weapons.

While we’re here, let’s come up with the weapons list. It probably looks something like

sword
mace
axe
spear
dagger
bow
staff

Let’s handle monster weaknesses and resistances by adjusting the monster’s P.R. (Protection RONA): +3 for resistances and -3 for weaknesses. For instance:

Mystic Skeleton
PR: 6 (9 vs arrows, swords and daggers)

Maiming and Slaughter

We’ve already come up with a colorful Maiming table. We can now tie that to the RONA system. If you (or a monster) get a critical success (10 higher than the RONA target number) you can roll on the maiming table. If you happen to roll a double crit (20 higher than the RONA) let’s say you kill your target instantly. We’ll call that a slaughter because that’s the sort of term that probably would have distressed 80s parents.

Say, what are the odds of having a character get Slaughtered by a freak roll of the dice?

I tend to think that monsters always roll 1d12s: the extra d12 from Traits are one of the ways that players have an advantage over their environment. In order to Slaughter an unarmored character with a RONA of 6, a monster needs a 26. That means rolling 12 twice, and then rolling a 6 or higher. The odds of this are about 1 in 300.

How many times is a character attacked between level 1 and level 9? Well, earlier we decided that it takes 70 game sessions to get to level 9. Let’s conservatively guess that there are two combats per session. Unarmored characters try to stay out of the way, but they probably get attacked at least once per battle. Over 9 levels, that’s about 300 attacks: you’ve got an even chance of being Slaughtered before you get to level 10. Add to that the chances of death by HP depletion, traps, tricks, and Maze-related madness, and it’s obviously quite an accomplishment to make it to the level-10 cap.

Fumbling

If there’s a special chart for critical hits, there needs to be a chart for critical failures too. If you roll ten less than a target Protection RONA, you have to roll on the Fumble Chart.

Fumble Subtable
1: The character impales himself with his or another’s weapon. Character rolls damage on himself.
1: The character makes the same attack again, this time on an ally.
3: The character’s weapon or spell breaks.
4-5: The character’s weapon or spell flies across the room.
6-7: The character leaves himself open. One opponent may make a free attack.
8-9: The character falls down. He loses his next turn.
10-11: The character misses spectacularly. No other effect.
12: If there is another enemy in range, the character automatically hits that enemy.

On a double fumble (20 lower than the target’s P.R.) the character kills himself with his own weapon.

OK, our combat system is pretty solid. We maybe erred in basing it on the same mechanic as everything else in the game; to maintain fidelity to 80’s RPG style, we should have had it be a whole separate subsystem. But at least we jammed in a few unnecessary charts.

Next week we’ll finish off whatever odds and ends of rules we haven’t addressed yet. The Mazed condition springs to mind. Then, the week after: the official release of Mazes and Monsters 1st Edition, just in time for Christmas!

Edit: We won’t do that. Instead, next time: we’ll get mazed!

how to DJ your own funeral

Friday, December 10th, 2010

One type of common artifact found in the Zimbabwe ruins was “perforated clay disks”. Archaeologists believe they were spinning wheels, but “they could have other uses.”

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

African Civilizations by Graham Connah

If PCs found, among the ruins, a bunch of perforated clay disks, what interesting mystery could they pose? If the PCs find out that they’re spinning wheels, that will be kind of a dud mystery. Some magical or ritual significance is in order.

When you spin the disks, using some wood and string contraption (sold separately), the disks emit a ghostly wail. When spun at the right speed, they allow communication with the dead.

Why, then, are there so many of the disks, found all over the ruin? You’d think you’d only need a couple, probably found in the temple.

Perhaps every reasonably rich person has a personal clay disk made, which is keyed to the owner’s voice. After someone’s death, his or her loved ones can ask them important questions “Who killed you? Do you love me? Who gets the armoire?” for a few days before the person’s soul journeys on.

The people who lived in this ruin must have been really into ancestors and death. They’re starting to sound like dwarves. Yeah, gotta be dwarves.

hit points and damage in mazes and monsters

Monday, December 6th, 2010
This entry is part 17 of 34 in the series Mazes and Monsters

We’ve pretty much gotten a complete RPG out of Mazes and Monsters, and now we’re putting together the final pieces. In a total reversal of normal RPG design, we’re putting together the combat rules last!

For reference, here’s Iglacia the Fighter’s character sheet:

Page 1:

click for larger version

Page 2:

Combat System

For our combat rules, we need something baroque, something byzantine, something a little quirky.

Sure, we could just abstract combat, make it an instance of the general action resolution mechanic, the way modern, non-combat-oriented games do: but this is the 80s. This is a game called MAZES AND MONSTERS. It’s about fighting monsters and stealing their treasure (and working out your neuroses along the way). It needs detailed combat rules, preferably with charts.

We already know some details about the combat system. The Columbo-like detective said it featured “maiming”. We know that characters have Hit Points (dozens or hundreds of them). From the way that Tom Hanks stood between the muggers, we can guess it doesn’t feature flanking or tactical movement. And from the lethality of traps, I’d guess that combat in Mazes and Monsters can be a fairly deadly affair.

Combat rules can be reduced to four pieces: Hit Points, Damage rolls, Hit Rolls, and Defenses. We’ll take the first two today.

Hit Points

At level 9, Iglacia the Fighter has 181 HP. An awkward number: approximately 20 HP per level, but off by one. It seems that there is some random die rolling involved. And in Mazes and Monsters, if there’s die rolling, there are d12s.

We could use our exploding die rolls here, but it doesn’t seem reasonable that someone could roll a negative number for hit points. Imagine a first-level character who starts with -5 HP! I mean, this is the 80s, the decade of death during character creation, but let’s avoid that little headache and have HP rolls be regular d12 rolls.

The average roll of 3d12 is 19.5; if fighters roll 3d12 per level for HP, a 9th level fighter would average 175.5. Iglacia’s 181 is perfectly reasonable, especially considering that players’ HP scores trend high. There’s a long RPG tradition of cheating on your hit-point rolls.

D&D-like games usually have tiers of classes, toughness-wise: for instance, Basic D&D gives fighters d8s for Hit Points, clerics d6es and magic-users and rogues d4. Advanced D&D inflated things up to d10 for fighters, and then gave d12s to barbarians, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. We’ll introduce power creep in later supplements. For now, let’s give tough classes, like Fighters, 3d12 HP per level; and weaker classes, like Holy Men and Frenetics, 2d12 HP.

What about monsters? I don’t know about you, but rolling 27d12 to generate the Hit Points of a 9th-level monster doesn’t sound very fun to me. Let’s give monsters static HP by level.

Monsters, to my mind, come in two tiers: melee monsters and ranged. Let’s give melee monsters 20 HP per level (similar to fighters in toughness) and ranged monsters 10 HP per level (a little less than Holy Men and Frenetics).

Damage Rolls

You can derive average damage from average HP by answering the following question: all things being equal, how many hits can a hero take? and dividing accordingly.

I get the sense that Mazes and Monsters is a deadly game. However, as our friends prove, it is possible to get to level 9, so the odds are stacked towards the smart player!

My guess – based on the same instinct that led me to peg spell points at 20 per level and spells at 10 spell points per level – is that, on average, a fighter can take maybe two solid hits: but I wouldn’t be surprised if a monster can one-shot a player with a good enough damage roll.

Let’s start with two types of attacks, Weak attacks and Strong attacks.

Weak attacks – like a sprite’s dagger, or an ogre’s sling – do exploding 1d12 damage times the attacker’s level. (It’s a great way to learn your times table!)

Average damage for a weak attack is 5.5 HP per level, while fighters have an average of around 20 HP per level. On average, Iglacia the fighter can take 4 Weak hits from 9th-level adversaries before being killed.

Strong attacks – like a sprite’s bow, or an ogre’s club – do exploding 2d12 damage times the attacker’s level.

Two Strong attacks from a 9th level opponent will kill Iglacia. One such attack has almost a 50% chance of dropping Pardieux. He’d better only resort to front-line fighting as a last resort! He’d better rely on his spells, or on reason.

Next week, let’s figure out hit rolls, armor, weapons, and all that jazz. Then we’ll have a complete combat system.

clerics and The Curse of Chalion

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

I picked up this book as the fifth book of a “five for 5 dollars” deal at a used bookstore. I had the vague feeling that I’d heard of the author, Lois McMaster Bujold, before, but had no expectations about the book.

I have an uninformed prejudice against modern (80’s and later) fantasy, so The Curse of Chalion was a pleasant surprise. It’s definitely post-Game of Thrones (lots of court intrigue, and — the big tipoff — knights are called “ser”) but it fits in one regular-sized book and it’s not quite as horrific.

At one point, a character gains the ability to see ghosts, and discovers that they’re everywhere. They’re constantly trying to communicate with the living, but only “saints” can see them.

applying this to your game

D&D 4e cosmology has it that that when anyone dies, they spend a few days or weeks “nearby” before they (mostly) journey on to their final resting places. Imagine if these days are weeks are spent as ghosts, able to observe but not affect the living world. The day after a battle, thousands of ghosts are wandering the battlefield. Meanwhile, dozens of ghosts are ineffectively trying to warn people away from a witch’s house.

What if a character gains the ability to see ghosts? Maybe he or she can do so only when close to death – only when bloodied, for instance. In this case, vital information might only become available halfway through a battle. Outside of battle, the character would have to spend healing surges to conduct spirit research.

What if funeral rituals are the only way to give peace to the dead and prevent undead? Adventuring clerics suddenly gain a lot more importance in the game world. They are the only people who can journey to the dangerous places in the world and perform the burial rituals that release trapped spirits. Perhaps the ability to see spirits when bloodied becomes a clerical class feature, as does the ability to release a spirit from its body.

The ghosts seen by a cleric will have different goals. Most will try to lead the cleric to their bodies so that the cleric can perform a funeral ritual. Some, evil ghosts, will try to lure the cleric into danger or ambush.

Imagined this way, clerics are the ultimate healers: they heal your body while you’re alive, and then they heal your soul’s sickness once you’re dead.